Italian Court Convicts Ex-Autostrade CEO Over Genoa Bridge Collapse

ArchivedSources Agree
  • July 16, 2026 at 10:33 AM ET
  • Est. Read: 2 Mins
Italian Court Convicts Ex-Autostrade CEO Over Genoa Bridge CollapseAI-generated illustration — does not depict real events
Listen to This SummaryAI-generated audio

Key Takeaways

An Italian court sentenced former Autostrade per l’Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci to 12 years for his role in the deadly collapse of Genoa’s Morandi highway bridge. The disaster killed 43 people and shocked Italy.

  • Former Autostrade CEO receives 12-year sentence for manslaughter charges
  • Trial involved 57 defendants, including executives and government officials
  • Prosecutors argued years of maintenance neglect led to the collapse
  • Defense contended a construction defect caused the disaster

Source Claims Check

High Consensus
All 9 publishers report consistent facts across 6 key claims.
ClaimStatusReason
Bridge Collapse DateBroad AgreementAugust 14, 2018
Number Of VictimsBroad Agreement43 people killed
Sentence For Giovanni CastellucciBroad Agreement12 years in prison
Total Defendants In TrialBroad Agreement57 defendants
Bridge Length And DesignBroad Agreement1,182 metres long designed by Riccardo Morandi
Financial Settlement AmountBroad Agreement€30 million in penalties paid by Autostrade and its subsidiary
Bridge Collapse Date
Broad Agreement
August 14, 2018
Number Of Victims
Broad Agreement
43 people killed
Sentence For Giovanni Castellucci
Broad Agreement
12 years in prison
Total Defendants In Trial
Broad Agreement
57 defendants
Bridge Length And Design
Broad Agreement
1,182 metres long designed by Riccardo Morandi
Financial Settlement Amount
Broad Agreement
€30 million in penalties paid by Autostrade and its subsidiary
This analysis is AI-generated and may not perfectly represent each source's reporting. Always read the original articles for full context.

An Italian court on Thursday convicted former Autostrade per l’Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci to a 12-year sentence for his role in the deadly collapse of Genoa’s Morandi highway bridge that killed 43 people nearly eight years ago. The verdict came after a four-year trial involving 57 defendants, including former executives of Autostrade and its engineering subsidiary SPEA, as well as officials from Italy’s Infrastructure and Transport Ministry.

The crowded courtroom was packed with relatives of those who plunged to their deaths when the Morandi Bridge collapsed during a rainstorm on August 14, 2018. The disaster shocked Italians on one of the country's busiest travel days, as millions were heading out for the traditional Ferragosto holiday.

Prosecutors argued that years of maintenance neglect led to the collapse and demanded combined sentences totaling nearly 400 years for all defendants. They alleged that failures to maintain the bridge, which was part of a main route linking northern Italy with the French Riviera, resulted in multiple counts of manslaughter. The defense contended that the fault lay with a construction defect rather than negligence.

The trial spanned more than 280 hearings and highlighted serious lapses in infrastructure maintenance. Egle Possetti, who lost her sister and family members in the collapse, expressed hope that the verdict would bring justice and acknowledge the failures that led to the tragedy. The current Autostrade CEO, Arrigo Giana, issued a public apology, stating that the actions of some people left indelible scars.

Autostrade and its subsidiary reached a financial settlement earlier in the proceedings, paying roughly €30 million in penalties. A new bridge designed by architect Renzo Piano opened in 2020, replacing the destroyed structure with a more high-tech design that includes maintenance robots to prevent future disasters.

How this summary was created

This summary synthesizes reporting from 9 independent publishers using AI. All sources are cited and linked below. NewsBalance is a news aggregator and media literacy tool, not a news publisher. AI-generated content may contain errors or inaccuracies — always verify important information with the original sources.

Read our full methodology →

Read the original reporting ↓