Voters Likely to Back Troubled Candidates

ArchivedSources Agree
  • June 9, 2026 at 7:53 AM ET
  • Est. Read: 2 Mins
Voters Likely to Back Troubled CandidatesAI-generated illustration — does not depict real events
Listen to This SummaryAI-generated audio

Key Takeaways

A new Reuters/Ipsos poll finds that most Americans are unlikely to abandon their party's candidate due to controversies. The poll highlights deep partisan divides and shows strong support for Graham Platner in Maine and Ken Paxton in Texas, despite their respective scandals.

  • Two-thirds of party-aligned respondents say they sometimes vote for candidates they don't like to prevent the opposing party from winning
  • Only 17% of Democrats would refrain from voting for Platner due to his Nazi-linked tattoo
  • Similarly, 17% of Republicans would not vote for Paxton despite his fraud indictment
  • Both Platner and Paxton are seen as strong contenders in their respective Senate races

Source Claims Check

High Consensus
All 3 publishers report consistent facts across 3 key claims.
ClaimStatusReason
Platner's Tattoo Impact On Democratic VotersBroad AgreementOnly 17% of Democrats would refrain from voting due to Platner's tattoo.
Paxton's Indictment Impact On Republican VotersBroad AgreementOnly 17% of Republicans would refrain from voting due to Paxton's indictment.
Platner's Apology For The TattooBroad AgreementPlatner apologized and covered the tattoo with another one.
Platner's Tattoo Impact On Democratic Voters
Broad Agreement
Only 17% of Democrats would refrain from voting due to Platner's tattoo.
Paxton's Indictment Impact On Republican Voters
Broad Agreement
Only 17% of Republicans would refrain from voting due to Paxton's indictment.
Platner's Apology For The Tattoo
Broad Agreement
Platner apologized and covered the tattoo with another one.
This analysis is AI-generated and may not perfectly represent each source's reporting. Always read the original articles for full context.

Americans appear unwilling to abandon their party's candidates over controversies, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll. The survey highlights deep partisan divides, with two-thirds of party-aligned respondents saying they sometimes vote for candidates they don't like just to stop the opposing party from winning power. This principle is being tested in Maine and Texas, where Democratic candidate Graham Platner and Republican Ken Paxton face significant controversies but remain strong contenders.

In Maine, oyster farmer Platner hopes to become a Senate candidate despite having a Nazi-style skull-and-crossbones tattoo. According to the poll, just 17% of Democrats familiar with Platner said his tattoo would stop them from voting for him. Similarly, in Texas, only 17% of Republicans nationwide said they would refrain from voting for Attorney General Paxton, who was indicted a decade ago on charges of defrauding investors.

Both elections could help determine which party controls the Senate, where Republicans currently hold a 53-47 majority. Platner has apologized for the tattoo and covered it with another tattoo last year after he launched his campaign. Despite controversies, including reports of sexually explicit messages exchanged with women while married, Platner is seen as a strong contender to oust Republican Senator Susan Collins.

The poll gathered responses from 4,531 U.S. adults nationwide and had a margin of error of 2 percentage points for respondents overall and 4 points for Republicans and Democrats familiar with the two candidates. The survey was conducted as further scrutiny fell on Platner, including reports about his past behavior being politically motivated.

In Texas, Paxton triumphed in the state's primary election after winning President Donald Trump's endorsement but will face a tough general election opponent in Democrat James Talarico. After his indictment, Paxton was impeached by the Texas House and last year his wife filed for divorce on biblical grounds. He has denied all wrongdoing and says the allegations against him are politically motivated.

How this summary was created

This summary synthesizes reporting from 3 independent publishers using AI. All sources are cited and linked below. NewsBalance is a news aggregator and media literacy tool, not a news publisher. AI-generated content may contain errors or inaccuracies — always verify important information with the original sources.

Read our full methodology →

Read the original reporting ↓