The U.S. Department of Justice has asked a federal judge, Eleanor Ross, to step aside from hearing its bid to force the state of Georgia to turn over a copy of its non-public voter registration list after she was linked to a judicial misconduct case.
Key Takeaways
The U.S. Department of Justice has asked Judge Eleanor Ross to step aside from a case involving Georgia's voter records due to alleged ties to Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and past misconduct. The DOJ argues her attendance at Willis's victory party creates an appearance of bias, as Willis is known for prosecuting President Donald Trump.
Source Claims Check
1 Difference Found| Claim | Status | Reason | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge's Attendance At Political Event | 1 Difference | Reuters and CNBC report Judge Ross's attendance; CBS News notes AP has not confirmed this. | ▼ |
| Judge's Misconduct | Broad Agreement | Judge Ross reprimanded for misconduct and attending political event. | |
| Doj's Recusal Request | Broad Agreement | DOJ seeks Judge Ross's recusal over appearance of bias. | |
| Case Background | Broad Agreement | Case involves DOJ lawsuit against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger over election recor… |
According to Reuters and CNBC, the DOJ filed the request following reports that identified Judge Ross as the unnamed judge who had been privately reprimanded for having sex with a high-ranking police officer in her chambers within earshot of law clerks. The DOJ argued that Ross's attendance at a political campaign event for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis created an appearance of bias.
Fox News reported that the affair took place over several years from 2023 until 2025, and that Ross lied about it when caught. The publication also noted that Ross cursed at staff who objected to her behavior and retaliated against those who reported the misconduct.
The DOJ's motion for recusal cited news outlets that had identified Judge Ross as the jurist in question. According to CNBC, the Eleventh Circuit Judicial Council found that a 'Subject Judge' committed judicial misconduct by attending a partisan political event and engaging in extramarital sex in chambers with a high-ranking police officer.
The DOJ argued that Ross's attendance at Willis's victory party created an appearance of bias, as Willis is known for prosecuting President Donald Trump. According to Reuters, the DOJ stated that 'a judge who attended a party celebrating the election of a Democrat best known for prosecuting a Republican President for alleged election interference cannot then preside over a case concerning that President’s efforts to ensure election integrity.'
The case in question is United States v. Raffensperger, which involves the DOJ's lawsuit against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger over his refusal to turn over election records.
How this summary was created
This summary synthesizes reporting from 4 independent publishers using AI. All sources are cited and linked below. NewsBalance is a news aggregator and media literacy tool, not a news publisher. AI-generated content may contain errors or inaccuracies — always verify important information with the original sources.
