DOJ Seeks Deportation of Afghan Woman in First Terrorist Removal Case

Conflicting Facts
  • July 30, 2026 at 6:27 PM ET
  • Est. Read: 2 Mins
DOJ Seeks Deportation of Afghan Woman in First Terrorist Removal CaseAI-generated illustration — does not depict real events

Key Takeaways

The Justice Department is seeking to deport an Afghan woman and U.S. permanent resident, Nazira Haji Zada, in the first-ever test case before the secretive Alien Terrorist Removal Court. The DOJ alleges she supported her son and son-in-law's ISIS-inspired plot targeting the 2024 election.

  • Justice Department accuses Nazira Haji Zada of being an 'alien terrorist'
  • First hearing held in the newly activated Alien Terrorist Removal Court after 30 years
  • Haji Zada's son and son-in-law were convicted for plotting a mass shooting on Election Day
  • Judge Joan Ericksen to review classified evidence against Haji Zada

Source Claims Check

1 Difference Found
All 4 publishers report consistent facts across 2 key claims. 1 point of difference noted.
ClaimStatusReason
Allegations Against Nazira Haji Zada1 DifferenceCBS News and UPI report allegations of support for ISIS-inspired plot; NPR notes lack of criminal charges
Court Hearing Date And TimeBroad AgreementHearing held on July 30 at 11:30 a.m. ET in Washington, D.C.
Classification Of EvidenceBroad AgreementEvidence against Haji Zada is classified and cannot be reviewed by her.
Allegations Against Nazira Haji Zada
CBS News and UPI report allegations of support for ISIS-inspired plot; NPR notes lack of criminal charges
Court Hearing Date And Time
Broad Agreement
Hearing held on July 30 at 11:30 a.m. ET in Washington, D.C.
Classification Of Evidence
Broad Agreement
Evidence against Haji Zada is classified and cannot be reviewed by her.
This analysis is AI-generated and may not perfectly represent each source's reporting. Always read the original articles for full context.

The Justice Department is seeking to deport an Afghan woman and U.S. permanent resident, Nazira Haji Zada, in the first-ever test case before the secretive Alien Terrorist Removal Court, according to multiple reports. The DOJ alleges that Haji Zada, a 47-year-old resident of Fort Worth, Texas, supported her son and son-in-law's ISIS-inspired plot targeting the 2024 election.

Haji Zada appeared in court on Thursday wearing a cream-colored head covering and relying on an interpreter to help her understand the proceedings. Her court-appointed lawyer, Matthew Farley, argued that the entire legal process is unfair and unconstitutional, accusing the Justice Department of violating his client's due process rights.

The Alien Terrorist Removal Court was created by Congress in 1996 but had never been used until now. It was set up to deport noncitizens who could not be removed by traditional legal processes because the information about their cases is classified and cannot be made public for national security reasons. The targets of these proceedings are not permitted to review the classified evidence against them, unlike in criminal proceedings.

Haji Zada's son, Abdullah Haji Zada, and her son-in-law, Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi, were convicted last year for purchasing two AK-47-style rifles and 500 rounds of ammunition from an undercover FBI agent as part of the alleged plot. The DOJ alleges that Nazira Haji Zada 'supported' their conspiracy and 'pledged loyalty to ISIS,' working with her son-in-law to radicalize the family.

U.S. District Judge Joan Ericksen, who presides over the case, pressed the government to provide more details about the evidence against Haji Zada during the hearing. She also indicated that she intends to rely on the 'working presumption' that defense counsel will be able to review the classified information.

How this summary was created

This summary synthesizes reporting from 4 independent publishers using AI. All sources are cited and linked below. NewsBalance is a news aggregator and media literacy tool, not a news publisher. AI-generated content may contain errors or inaccuracies — always verify important information with the original sources.

Read our full methodology →

Read the original reporting ↓